Take an informal poll of Kenyans today
about the biggest problem facing the country, and chances are better than even
that you’ll get a variation on two answers – corruption and its ugly little
brother, impunity. You may, in addition, also get some respondents speaking
about tribalism. All these responses are understandable, especially given what
the country has witnessed over the past few weeks.
Revelations and allegations of breathtaking
graft, with some outrageous little details (pianos? condom dispensers?), seem
to have brought the country’s sense of indignation to something close to
boiling point. Carol Musyoka, who was on my radio programme last week, thinks
that things are coming to a head – there is a chance that the current ferment
will lead to a denouement of some kind.
I’m not sure I agree, and even the
diagnosis of the problem (as illustrated by our hypothetical focus group) is
more looking at the symptoms, rather than the ailment itself. The responses, as
well, have a certain familiarity about them that indicate that this is a
passing storm, and Kenyans will be back to business as usual.
The problem, as I see it, is in the
smallness of our thinking. The rapacity with which the corrupt among us are
trying to accumulate wealth is similar to what would happen if you let a street
urchin into a feast. The attempt to grab as much as possible, as quickly as
possible, is indicative of a populace which has little trust in itself, and
little trust in the future. Those stealing have a haunted look about their
demeanour that indicates a fear of the closing of opportunity.
This is not just in the public sector, or
in the highest reaches of public office. I had a chance to meet and speak to an
investor and depositor in the recently shuttered Imperial Bank. Many of the
facts about how the deceased Managing Director, Abdulmalek Janmohamed, stole
tens of billions of shillings have been documented. The details I was given,
though, and the documents I saw, simply stop you in your tracks when you see
how the fraud was executed. Anything from keeping three sets of books (one for
the board, which was kept in the dark; one for Central Bank of Kenya
inspectors; and one the true set, which was then used to keep track of how much
could be skimmed); to handwritten and verbal instructions for the transfer of
tens of millions of shillings (up to KSh 80 million a week). Instructions were
e-mailed to inspectors at the Central Bank to amend already-submitted reports (establishing
the culpability of the bank inspection section at the CBK, and correcting
malpractices there, may be one of the long-lasting results of the whole saga).
Software was altered to spit out erroneous reports, meaning that a cursory
glance at the books would have revealed little wrong.
According to the person I spoke to, the
board of Imperial Bank met for twenty three years on mostly fictitious board
packets (the set of documents boards of directors are sent and which are the
basis of their meetings). In effect, the late Mr. Janmohamed had created a
parallel bank (and a superficially successful one) within the shell of an
institution that was showing signs of good growth. The fact that the fraud was
only found out and reported by the board to the Central Bank after Mr.
Janmohamed’s demise made this almost the perfect crime. (There had been an
attempt to blow the whistle by some employees back in April 2012, but it did
not register on anyone’s radar – including, admittedly, the media, who were
part of the e-mail blast).
Another form of graft, which is much smaller,
but equally, illustrative, is one that I have been told about by two different
sources. Inspectors from the health inspectorate have been busy visiting
private offices, especially in Industrial Area in Nairobi, and harassing (and
seeking bribes from) businesspeople there who have coffee percolators in their
offices. These businesspeople (largely Kenyan Asians) have been asked for food
handling certificates, in effect being accused of running restaurants when all
they wanted was a freshly-brewed cup of coffee.
All these are remarkable, not because of
the crimes committed, but at the sheer ingenuity required to pull them off. As Carol
and I discussed on radio, if half that resourcefulness and imagination were
actually channelled in legal methods, Kenya would never have to worry about
economic growth. So why isn’t it? It goes back to that smallness in our
thinking. The people involved either don’t have faith in their ability to use
their imagination to build world-class operations, or they are such short-term
thinkers that this doesn’t even occur to them. As with the urchin at the feast,
they try and pile their loot as high as they can on their too-small plates,
never thinking that they can, with a bit of work and a bit of patience, host
the feast themselves.
Also published in the Daily Nation on 10 November 2015.
Comments
Post a Comment